Covert v. Covert

115 F. 493, 53 C.C.A. 225, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4225
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 8, 1902·No. No. 89·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

EACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The specification states that the in* vention relates to wagon jacks, and

—“Has for its object to provide a simple and approved device of this char* acter, of such construction as to dispense with the necessity for the provision of special locking means for retaining the jack in elevated position. A further object of the invention is to provide a simple and improved jack [494] of this character, which will possess advantages in point of inexpensiveness, durability, ease of operation, and general efficiency. * * * Fig. 1 is a perspective view in position for use. Fig. 2 is a side elevation, illustrating the jack as it appears in its extended position.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Covert v. Covert, 115 F. 493, 53 C.C.A. 225, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4225 (2d Cir. 1902).

115 F. 493 (Covert v. Covert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mayer v. Mutschler
248 F. 911 (Second Circuit, 1918)