Covert v. Cold Springs Utilities Co.

79 S.W.2d 1118, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 168
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 5, 1935
DocketNo. 2632
StatusPublished

This text of 79 S.W.2d 1118 (Covert v. Cold Springs Utilities Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Covert v. Cold Springs Utilities Co., 79 S.W.2d 1118, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 168 (Tex. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

O’QUINN, Justice.

This is a companion case to Kaplan v. Cold Springs Utility Company, reported in 76 S.W.(2d) at page 584. In fact, this is a part of the Kaplan Case. Covert and Kaplan being defendants in the suit, and, when judgment went against them, they both appealed, Kaplan by regular appeal, and Covert by writ of error.

For a statement of the nature and result of the suit, we refer to Kaplan v. Cold Springs Utility Company, supra. As the pleadings of the parties there are the same here, being the same case, and the evidence identical, this appeal is controlled by the holdings in that appeal.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 S.W.2d 1118, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/covert-v-cold-springs-utilities-co-texapp-1935.