Covert v. Cold Springs Utilities Co.
This text of 79 S.W.2d 1118 (Covert v. Cold Springs Utilities Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion case to Kaplan v. Cold Springs Utility Company, reported in 76 S.W.(2d) at page 584. In fact, this is a part of the Kaplan Case. Covert and Kaplan being defendants in the suit, and, when judgment went against them, they both appealed, Kaplan by regular appeal, and Covert by writ of error.
For a statement of the nature and result of the suit, we refer to Kaplan v. Cold Springs Utility Company, supra. As the pleadings of the parties there are the same here, being the same case, and the evidence identical, this appeal is controlled by the holdings in that appeal.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 S.W.2d 1118, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/covert-v-cold-springs-utilities-co-texapp-1935.