Coventry v. New York Indemnity Co.
This text of 229 A.D. 822 (Coventry v. New York Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Hinman, Acting P. J., dissents on the authority of Hermance v. Globe Indemnity Company (221 App. Div. 394), and votes for a reversal and new trial on the ground that there was a question of fact whether, under all the facts and circumstances, the insured had sufficient information to persuade him as a reasonable man that he was in an accident, and that under his policy he should have given written notice to his insurance company of the particulars thereof, which question was not passed upon by the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 A.D. 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coventry-v-new-york-indemnity-co-nyappdiv-1930.