Covenhoven v. State

1 N.J.L. 258
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1794
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.J.L. 258 (Covenhoven v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Covenhoven v. State, 1 N.J.L. 258 (N.J. 1794).

Opinion

Per Cur.

The objections are insufficient, there was both notice and appearance; — the signature of the Justice to the inquisition is unnecessary: — as to the figures, the cases cited apply exclusively to indictments, in New-Jersey these inquisitions are considered as civil prosecutions, and as quashing is not de jure we will not do it on these exceptions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.J.L. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/covenhoven-v-state-nj-1794.