Covenant Palms of Miami, Inc. v. Gustafson

207 So. 2d 488, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5947
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 1968
DocketNo. 67-285
StatusPublished

This text of 207 So. 2d 488 (Covenant Palms of Miami, Inc. v. Gustafson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Covenant Palms of Miami, Inc. v. Gustafson, 207 So. 2d 488, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5947 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The basic question in this appeal is whether the evidence before the chancellor sufficiently supports the decree in favor of the appellee, defendant-counter-claimant. We have carefully examined the record on appeal and find no basis for disturbing the [489]*489decree appealed. Alvarez v. Dumont, Fla.App.1965, 178 So.2d 352; Central Bank and Trust Co. v. Banner Trading Co., Fla.App.1963, 157 So.2d 201; Turner v. Noto, Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 303; DiMarco v. King, Fla.App.1962, 139 So.2d 750.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Di Marco v. King
139 So. 2d 750 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Alvarez v. Dumont
178 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Turner v. Noto
151 So. 2d 303 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Banner Trading Co.
157 So. 2d 201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 So. 2d 488, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/covenant-palms-of-miami-inc-v-gustafson-fladistctapp-1968.