Covell v. Mosely

15 Mich. 514, 1867 Mich. LEXIS 48
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 9, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 15 Mich. 514 (Covell v. Mosely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Covell v. Mosely, 15 Mich. 514, 1867 Mich. LEXIS 48 (Mich. 1867).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It has always been held by this court that unless in case of gross negligence, no appeal will be dismissed where the return is filed before the motion to dismiss is called on.

In this case, the parties being apprised of the irregularity of the return, at once took such steps as were in their power to have the mistake rectified.

They are not, therefore, in fault, and the appeal can not be dismissed on that ground.

The claim of appeal forms no necessary part of an appeal, and the filing of a bond, properly approved, is the only condition required by law. This bond is a valid bond of appeal for those parties in whose behalf it purports to have been filed, and the fact that all the parties whose names appear in the claim for appeal have not joined in it, can not invalidate it as to those parties who did not join. As to them, therefore, the appeal is valid, and the motion to dismiss must be denied, and inasmuch as upon being notified they at once offered to do all that justice required, no costs will be awarded against them.

Lena Young, one of the defendants, not having joined in the bond, and the bond not appearing to have been made in her behalf, she can not be regarded as having [516]*516aj>pealed. There being no bond in her behalf, there is nothing to amend; and having lost her appeal by lapse oí time, it is out of the power of this court to relieve her.

Motion on her behalf denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farmers' Development Co. v. Rayado Land & Irrigation Co.
18 N.M. 138 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1913)
Elwood v. Board of Supervisors
136 N.W. 709 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1912)
Harmon v. Metcalfe
96 N.W. 1060 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1903)
Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Chambers
50 N.W. 741 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Mich. 514, 1867 Mich. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/covell-v-mosely-mich-1867.