Covell v. Matthews

246 Mass. 497
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Covell v. Matthews. Read the opinion of the Court — 245 Mass. 135
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 22, 1923·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

This is a writ of entry. The decisive question is whether the demandant, being the record owner, is prevented from prevailing because of a mortgage on the locus. It was decided in Cowles v. Dickinson, 140 Mass. 373, that the title of a mortgagor, although termed an equity of redemption, was a legal estate of such nature as to enable its owner to maintain a writ of entry against a disseisor. That authority is conclusive against every contention of the tenant. Crowley v. Adams, 226 Mass. 582. Compare Covell v. Matthews, 245 Mass. 135.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Covell v. Matthews, 246 Mass. 497 (Mass. 1923).

246 Mass. 497 (Covell v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cowles v. Dickinson
5 N.E. 302 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)
Crowley v. Adams
116 N.E. 241 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1917)
Covell v. Matthews
139 N.E. 533 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)