Covarrubias v. Pane-Mcghee
This text of Covarrubias v. Pane-Mcghee (Covarrubias v. Pane-Mcghee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3
5 In re: Case No. 2:22-cv-01025-CDS
6 Victor M. Covarrubias aka Victor Manuel Covarrubias, Order Remanding to Bankruptcy Court, 7 Dismissing Appeal, and Closing Case Alleged Debtor 8 Victor M. Covarrubias aka 9 Victor Manuel Covarrubias,
10 Appellant
11 v.
12 Kelly McGhee-Pane,
13 Appellee 14 Alleged debtor and appellant Victor Covarrubias submits notice of Indicative Ruling of 15 Dismissal of Involuntary Petition after United States Bankruptcy Court Chief Judge August B. 16 Landis issued an indicative ruling under Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 8008(a)(3). 17 ECF No. 6. For the following reasons, I dismiss the pending appeal, remand this matter back to 18 the bankruptcy court for further proceedings, and close this case. 19 I. Background 20 Covarrubias filed a notice of appeal in the United States District Court for the District of 21 Nevada seeking relief from an order denying the dismissal of an involuntary Chapter 7 22 bankruptcy petition filed against him by appellee Kelly McGhee-Pane. See generally Appeal 23 Notice, ECF No. 1. While the appeal was pending, Covarrubias and McGhee-Pane 24 simultaneously filed motions for summary judgment in bankruptcy court. ECF No. 6-1 at 3. 25 Covarrubias included a request that Judge Landis issue an indicative ruling under Fed. R. Bankr. 26 P. 8008. ECF No. 6-1 at 3. 1 Subsequent to a hearing on the parties’ motions for summary judgment, Judge Landis 2 issued an indicative ruling stating that, if the matter were remanded back to the bankruptcy 3 court, the court would issue orders resolving the parties’ motions for summary judgment 4 thereby dismissing the case. Id. at 4. 5 II. Discussion 6 The filing of a notice of appeal from a decision of the bankruptcy court divests that court 7 of jurisdiction. Hagel v. Drummond (In re Hagel), 184 B.R. 793, 798 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1995). However, 8 the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure authorize the bankruptcy court to provide relief 9 pending appeal by making an indicative ruling. See generally Fed. R. Bank. P. 8008. Essentially, the 10 rule authorizes the bankruptcy court and the appellate court to share jurisdiction over the 11 matter. This permits the bankruptcy court, through an indicative ruling, to communicate to the 12 appellate court its intention to provide relief if the appeal is remanded for the purpose of 13 revesting the bankruptcy court with jurisdiction to do so. See In re Halper, 2019 WL 2762340, at 14 *3 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. June 28, 2019) (allowing a bankruptcy court to evaluate timely-filed motions 15 for relief where it would otherwise lack decisional authority because an appeal was pending). 16 Here, under Rule 8008, the bankruptcy court issued such an indicative ruling as a component of 17 Covarrubias’s motion for summary judgment. Judge Landis stated that, upon remand, he would 18 deny McGhee-Pane’s motion for summary judgment and grant Covarrubias’s motion for 19 summary judgment. While Covarrubias does not take any position on whether I should dismiss 20 the pending appeal or retain jurisdiction (ECF No. 6 at 3), I remand the matter to the 21 bankruptcy court to promote the “just, speedy and inexpensive determination of [the] case and 22 proceeding.” See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1001. 23 24 25 26 1 III. Conclusion 2 For the reasons stated above, I hereby order that this appeal is remanded to the 3 bankruptcy court for the purpose of revesting that court with jurisdiction to consider and rule 4 on the motions for summary judgment. 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is remanded to the bankruptcy court for further 6 proceedings under Rule 8008 and that this court relinquishes jurisdiction over the case. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellant Victor M. Covarrubias’s appeal from 8 bankruptcy court [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED. 9 The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 10 DATED: March 6, 2023 11 12 13 _________________________________ Cristina D. Silva 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Covarrubias v. Pane-Mcghee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/covarrubias-v-pane-mcghee-nvd-2023.