Couture v. FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
This text of 776 N.W.2d 911 (Couture v. FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Trade Jenkins COUTURE, Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Raymond Couture, Plaintiff/Appellee,
v.
FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/Appellant, and
Rodney Lee Daniels and Tanya Lynn Daniels, Defendants/Cross-Defendants/Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 6, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, and we REINSTATE the declaratory judgment entered by the Arenac Circuit Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
776 N.W.2d 911, 485 Mich. 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/couture-v-farm-bureau-general-insurance-company-mich-2010.