Coutu v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company

451 A.2d 579, 1982 R.I. LEXIS 1100
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided July 22, 1982·No. No. 82-263-M.P.·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner Cambridge Mutual Insurance Company seeks a writ of certiorari to review a Superior Court order that directed the company to produce various documents which the company believes are immune from discovery. Pursuant to the petition, we have examined a transcript of the Superior Court decision, but we are unable to ascertain therefrom the basis of the hearing judge’s ruling.

Accordingly, we hereby grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash that portion of the Superior Court order which granted the motion to compel production of the documents. The Superior Court is directed to reconsider the motion to compel production and, in deciding said motion, to give consideration to the pertinent principles enunciated by this court in Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. McAlpine, 120 R.I. 744, 391 A.2d 84 (1978).

Justice SHEA did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coutu v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 451 A.2d 579, 1982 R.I. LEXIS 1100 (R.I. 1982).

451 A.2d 579 (Coutu v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fireman's Fund Insurance v. McAlpine
391 A.2d 84 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1978)