Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. v. Anatian
This text of 275 A.D.2d 609 (Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. v. Anatian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered December 10, 1998, denying defendant’s motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum in aid of execution pursuant to CPLR article 52, affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
Under the unique circumstances presented, service of the subpoena upon defendant’s New York attorneys pursuant to court order was permissible {see, Judiciary Law § 2-b; CPLR 2303). While not determinative, we note that defendant was actively litigating a related Federal action in the United States District Court located within this State. Concur — Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.D.2d 609, 713 N.Y.S.2d 45, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coutts-bank-switzerland-ltd-v-anatian-nyappdiv-2000.