Coutsodontis v. Sea Trade Maritime Corp.

Fifth Circuit

Coutsodontis v. Sea Trade Maritime Corp.

571 F.3d 1341, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14057, 2009 WL 1688460

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 18, 2009

Docket08-30959

StatusPublished

This text of 571 F.3d 1341 (Coutsodontis v. Sea Trade Maritime Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coutsodontis v. Sea Trade Maritime Corp., 571 F.3d 1341, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14057, 2009 WL 1688460 (5th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant Stelios Coutsodontis appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana vacating its earlier arrest warrant of the MTV ATHENA, a vessel titled to Sea Trade Maritime Corporation. The district court determined that it lacked in rem admiralty jurisdiction under Rule D of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims to hear any of the claims asserted by Coutsodontis because he had not pleaded a maritime tort or a contract relating to the “ship in its use as such, or to commerce or navigation on navigable waters, or to transportation by sea or to maritime employment.” 1 After careful consideration of the facts and applicable law gleaned from our examination of the

record on appeal and the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we are convinced that the judgment of the district court vacating its arrest warrant and dismissing this action should be and hereby is,

AFFIRMED.

1

. Coutsodontis v. M/V ATHENA, Civ. A. No. 08-4285, 2008 WL 4330236, at *2 (E.D.La. Sept. 16, 2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant Stelios Coutsodontis appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana vacating its earlier arrest warrant of the MTV ATHENA, a vessel titled to Sea Trade Maritime Corporation. The district court determined that it lacked in rem admiralty jurisdiction under Rule D of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims to hear any of the claims asserted by Coutsodontis because he had not pleaded a maritime tort or a contract relating to the “ship in its use as such, or to commerce or navigation on navigable waters, or to transportation by sea or to maritime employment.” 1 After careful consideration of the facts and applicable law gleaned from our examination of the

record on appeal and the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we are convinced that the judgment of the district court vacating its arrest warrant and dismissing this action should be and hereby is,

AFFIRMED.

1

. Coutsodontis v. M/V ATHENA, Civ. A. No. 08-4285, 2008 WL 4330236, at *2 (E.D.La. Sept. 16, 2008).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

571 F.3d 1341, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14057, 2009 WL 1688460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coutsodontis-v-sea-trade-maritime-corp-ca5-2009.