Cousins v. Brashier

1 Blackf. 85, 1820 Ind. LEXIS 22
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 7, 1820
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Blackf. 85 (Cousins v. Brashier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cousins v. Brashier, 1 Blackf. 85, 1820 Ind. LEXIS 22 (Ind. 1820).

Opinion

HELD, that under the statute of 1807, a bond with surety must be executed and filed before the issuing of a foreign attachment, in the same manner as the statute of 1807 requires in cases of domestic attachments (1); and that the record of the case must contain a copy of the bond. Ind. Terr. Stat. 1807, p. 62. 469 (2).

The statute of 1817, p. 98, and of 1823, p. 69, expressly require that before the issuing of any writ of foreign attachment, a bond with surety must be executed and filed as in cases of domestic attachments. For the law respecting domestic attachments, vide Ind. Stat. 1823, p. 61.

The affidavit, writ of attachment, and declaration if there be one, should be inserted in the record. Bond v. Patterson, ante, p. 34. The advertisement of the pendency of the attachment, must appear by the record to have been proved. Foyles v. Kelso, in this Court, Nov. term, 1822, post.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henrie v. Sweasey
5 Blackf. 273 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1840)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Blackf. 85, 1820 Ind. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cousins-v-brashier-ind-1820.