Couse v. Canal Authority of the State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Couse v. Canal Authority of the State

203 So. 2d 56, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4410

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 1967·No. No. J-7·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in an eminent domain action wherein the appellants were awarded the sum of $15,000 by a jury for talcing of approximately twenty-nine acres of appellants’ property in Marion County, Florida, for the purpose of constructing and maintaining the Cross State Barge Canal.

We have examined the record on appeal and considered the briefs and arguments of counsel. Consideration of same fails to reflect that reversible error was committed. See Bainbridge v. State Road Department, 139 So.2d 714 (Fla.App. 1st 1962).

The judgment appealed is therefore affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in an eminent domain action wherein the appellants were awarded the sum of $15,000 by a jury for talcing of approximately twenty-nine acres of appellants’ property in Marion County, Florida, for the purpose of constructing and maintaining the Cross State Barge Canal.

We have examined the record on appeal and considered the briefs and arguments of counsel. Consideration of same fails to reflect that reversible error was committed. See Bainbridge v. State Road Department, 139 So.2d 714 (Fla.App. 1st 1962).

The judgment appealed is therefore affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Couse v. Canal Authority of the State, 203 So. 2d 56, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4410 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

203 So. 2d 56 (Couse v. Canal Authority of the State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related