Couse v. Canal Authority of the State
This text of 203 So. 2d 56 (Couse v. Canal Authority of the State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a final judgment in an eminent domain action wherein the appellants were awarded the sum of $15,000 by a jury for talcing of approximately twenty-nine acres of appellants’ property in Marion County, Florida, for the purpose of constructing and maintaining the Cross State Barge Canal.
We have examined the record on appeal and considered the briefs and arguments of counsel. Consideration of same fails to reflect that reversible error was committed. See Bainbridge v. State Road Department, 139 So.2d 714 (Fla.App. 1st 1962).
The judgment appealed is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 So. 2d 56, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/couse-v-canal-authority-of-the-state-fladistctapp-1967.