Courville v. Lasseigne

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Courville v. Lasseigne

624 So. 2d 1276, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 2822, 1993 WL 375356

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 22, 1993

DocketNo. 92-905

StatusPublished

This text of 624 So. 2d 1276 (Courville v. Lasseigne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Courville v. Lasseigne, 624 So. 2d 1276, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 2822, 1993 WL 375356 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

COOKS, Judge.

For the foregoing reasons assigned in the companion case of Theriot v. Lasseigne, 624 So.2d 1267 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1993) (Number 92-903 on our court docket), the lower court’s judgment is reversed to cast liability against DOTD and amended to fix the fault of Travis Courville and DOTD as follows:

[1277]*1277IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED judgment is rendered in favor of the plaintiffs against the State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, finding it thirty (30) percent at fault in causing the accident;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment is amended to reduce the percentage of fault assigned to Travis Courville to thirty (30) percent.

Further, the case is remanded to the trial court for a determination of damages and rendition of judgment consistent with the above apportionment of fault. All costs on appeal are assessed against DOTD.

AFFIRMED IN PART; AMENDED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; RENDERED; AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI