Courtyard Hairstyling North, Inc. v. McCollough

Indiana Court of Appeals

Courtyard Hairstyling North, Inc. v. McCollough

540 N.E.2d 129, 1989 Ind. App. LEXIS 496, 1989 WL 72392

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 29, 1989

DocketNo. 32A04-8806-CV-191

StatusPublished

This text of 540 N.E.2d 129 (Courtyard Hairstyling North, Inc. v. McCollough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Courtyard Hairstyling North, Inc. v. McCollough, 540 N.E.2d 129, 1989 Ind. App. LEXIS 496, 1989 WL 72392 (Ind. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee McCollough and appellant Sharpe are the sole shareholders of Courtyard Hairstyling North, Inc., an Indiana corporation. Each shareholder owns 50%. After the shareholders had a falling out, McCollough commenced this action to dissolve the corporation as deadlocked. See IC 28-1-47-1.

The trial court appointed a receiver to preserve the assets and subsequently entered its order directing that an accounting be made to the receiver, ordering an appraisal be made of the business and establishing a plan for the sale of the business. This interlocutory appeal was perfected from that order.

However, on November 1, 1988 the trial court granted a default judgment against appellants and on May 2, 1989 denied their motion to correct errors and TR 60 motion to set aside the default.

McCollough has moved to dismiss the appeal as moot and appellants have filed no response.

The default judgment necessarily superseded the interlocutory order that constitutes the basis for this appeal. It thereby rendered the issues presented herein moot.

This appeal is therefore dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI