Courtois v. Carpentier

6 F. Cas. 650, 1 Wash. C. C. 376
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 15, 1806
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 F. Cas. 650 (Courtois v. Carpentier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Courtois v. Carpentier, 6 F. Cas. 650, 1 Wash. C. C. 376 (circtdpa 1806).

Opinion

WASHINGTON, Circuit Justice

(charging the jury). The laws of the country, where this contract was made, must govern. These notes were payable in Guadaloupe, in sugar, at a valuation. The defendant, being sued [651]*651here, cannot complain, ii his situation is not made worse than it would have been in Guadeloupe. But, as according to our forms of proceeding, (and, as to them, the laws of our country must govern,) a judgment cannot be rendered for sugar; the value in money must be given, which, in effect, is the precise sum stated in the note. For, whether the sugar was worth one livre or seven livres per pound, still, when that sugar is turned again into money, it must come to the same sum. As to the fact of the depreciation of these notes, it should not be considered any more than in rendering judgment on bonds here, which we all know will sell, in some cases, at a considerable discount for cash. As to interest, none should be allowed; because, it is proved, that, at Guadaloupe, they do not carry interest, but from the judgment or registration.

The jury found a verdict for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howe v. Nickerson
96 Mass. 400 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1867)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 F. Cas. 650, 1 Wash. C. C. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtois-v-carpentier-circtdpa-1806.