Courtney Young v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Opinion
Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 575 Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS document No. CV-20-201
Date: 2021-08-23 14:10:07 Foxit PhantomPDF Version: 9.7.5 Opinion Delivered: December 9, 2020
COURTNEY YOUNG APPEAL FROM THE PHILLIPS APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 54CV-17-324]
V.
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER W. MORLEDGE, JUDGE
SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE APPELLEE ORDERED
PER CURIAM
We have pending before this court a motion filed by the appellant, Courtney Young,
to strike supplemental addendum and arguments pertaining to the supplemental addendum
contained in the response brief filed by the appellee, Shelter Mutual Insurance Company.
For the reasons set forth in this per curiam, we order appellee to file a supplemental response.
Appellant alleges that appellee’s supplemental addendum contains documents that are
not contained in the record on appeal and therefore must be struck. Appellee responded in
pertinent part by stating, “There is no question Supplemental Addendum Nos. 1 through
16 were and are a part of the record.” However, appellee does not identify the page
numbers where these documents are located in the record on appeal. Thus, we order
appellee to file a supplemental response within seven (7) calendar days and identify the page
number(s) in the record on appeal where the exhibits referred to as “Supplemental
Addendum Nos. 1 through 16” are located.
Supplemental response ordered.
David A. Hodges, for appellant.
Matthews, Sanders & Sayes, P.A., by: James T. Sayes, for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2020 Ark. App. 575 (Courtney Young v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.