Courtney v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Courtney v. State

809 S.W.2d 63, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 360, 1991 WL 31285

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 12, 1991

DocketNo. 58640

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 809 S.W.2d 63 (Courtney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Courtney v. State, 809 S.W.2d 63, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 360, 1991 WL 31285 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

On August 14, 1989, movant pled guilty to first degree murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment. He was delivered to the Department of Corrections on August 17, 1989.

Although movant claims he mailed a Rule 24.035 motion on September 19, 1989, the only motion found in the circuit clerk’s office is one notarized January 2, 1990, and filed in the circuit clerk’s office on January 5, 1990. A “post-conviction motion is deemed filed when it is lodged in the court clerk’s office not when the motion is mailed.” Williams v. State, 788 S.W.2d 795, 796 (Mo.App.E.D.1990).

Rule 24.035(b) requires the motion to be filed within ninety days after the movant is delivered to the Department of Corrections. Defendant’s time to file expired ninety days after August 17, 1989. His January 5, 1990, motion was time barred. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. banc 1989).

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI