Courtney v. Public Service Railway Co.
117 A. 925, 97 N.J.L. 564, 12 Gummere 564, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 238
This text of 117 A. 925 (Courtney v. Public Service Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Courtney v. Public Service Railway Co., 117 A. 925, 97 N.J.L. 564, 12 Gummere 564, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 238 (N.J. 1922).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere, ip the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenohard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
117 A. 925, 97 N.J.L. 564, 12 Gummere 564, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-v-public-service-railway-co-nj-1922.