Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Courtney v. Public Service Railway Co.

Courtney v. Public Service Railway Co.

117 A. 925, 97 N.J.L. 564, 12 Gummere 564, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 238
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Courtney v. Public Service Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 N.J.L. 308 →
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 19, 1922·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere, ip the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenohard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Courtney v. Public Service Railway Co., 117 A. 925, 97 N.J.L. 564, 12 Gummere 564, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 238 (N.J. 1922).

117 A. 925 (Courtney v. Public Service Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.