Courtney v. Ihlanfeldt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Courtney v. Ihlanfeldt

204 S.E.2d 312, 130 Ga. App. 637, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1212

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 24, 1974

Docket48938

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 S.E.2d 312 (Courtney v. Ihlanfeldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Courtney v. Ihlanfeldt, 204 S.E.2d 312, 130 Ga. App. 637, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1212 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the Civil Court of Fulton County on a proceeding brought pursuant to Code § 61-301 and from the denial of the defendant’s motion for a new trial following the entry of such judgment. In Daniel v. Federal National Mortgage Assn., 231 Ga. 385 (202 SE2d 388), it was held: "An action filed in the Civil Court of Fulton County in which the only relief sought is possession of real estate by the owner thereof is not subject to direct appeal to the Court of Appeals or this court. An appeal to the appellate division of that court must first be filed.” We are therefore constrained to dismiss this appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Bell, C. J., and Clark, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the Civil Court of Fulton County on a proceeding brought pursuant to Code § 61-301 and from the denial of the defendant’s motion for a new trial following the entry of such judgment. In Daniel v. Federal National Mortgage Assn., 231 Ga. 385 (202 SE2d 388), it was held: "An action filed in the Civil Court of Fulton County in which the only relief sought is possession of real estate by the owner thereof is not subject to direct appeal to the Court of Appeals or this court. An appeal to the appellate division of that court must first be filed.” We are therefore constrained to dismiss this appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Bell, C. J., and Clark, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 S.E.2d 312, 130 Ga. App. 637, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-v-ihlanfeldt-gactapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack