Courtney v. Connecticut Co.
88 A. 716, 87 Conn. 708, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 154
This text of 88 A. 716 (Courtney v. Connecticut Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Courtney v. Connecticut Co., 88 A. 716, 87 Conn. 708, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 154 (Colo. 1913).
Opinion
The jury could not, upon the evidence presented in this case, reasonably have found that the plaintiff was free from negligence proximately contributing to produce the injuries complained of. A verdict for the defendant was therefore properly directed. Fay v. Hartford & Springfield Street Ry. Co., 81 Conn. 330, 338, 71 Atl. 364.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Law Office of David Staats, P.A. v. Kelly (In Re Kelly)
316 B.R. 629 (D. Delaware, 2004)
Polin v. Delmarva Poultry Corp.
188 A.2d 364 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1963)
Travelers Insurance v. Gebo
106 Vt. 155 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1934)
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Gebo
170 A. 917 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1934)
In re Republic Engineering Co.
130 A. 498 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1925)
Godman v. Greer
105 A. 380 (Delaware Orphan's Court, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
88 A. 716, 87 Conn. 708, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-v-connecticut-co-conn-1913.