Courtney v. Arbon

D. Utah

Courtney v. Arbon

DecidedFebruary 1, 2021

Docket1:20-cv-00118

StatusUnknown

This text of Courtney v. Arbon (Courtney v. Arbon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Courtney v. Arbon, (D. Utah 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

CARL MACK COURTNEY JR., Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION un & DISMISSAL ORDER v. RYAN ARBON et al., Case No. 1:20-CV-118 TC Defendants. District Judge Tena Campbell

On November 18, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to within thirty days show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to submit an initial partial filing fee (IPFF). (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff responded with a letter stating that, instead of paying his IPFF now, he will file again “at a later date as [he is] still interested in filing a more complete amended version of this suit.” (Id. at 13.)! Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that--for failure to pay his IPFF--Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See DUCivR 41-2. This action is CLOSED. DATED this Ist day of February, 2021. BY THE COURT:

TENA CAMPBELL United States District Judge

' As he contemplates filing these claims in a new suit in the future, Plaintiff should keep in mind that “Utah's four- year residual statute of limitations .. . governs suits brought under section 1983.” Fratus v. Deland, 49 F.3d 673, 675 (10th Cir. 1995). Plaintiff's claims accrued when "facts that would support a cause of action [we]re or should [have] be[en] apparent." /d. at 675 (citation omitted).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

CARL MACK COURTNEY JR., Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION un & DISMISSAL ORDER v. RYAN ARBON et al., Case No. 1:20-CV-118 TC Defendants. District Judge Tena Campbell

On November 18, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to within thirty days show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to submit an initial partial filing fee (IPFF). (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff responded with a letter stating that, instead of paying his IPFF now, he will file again “at a later date as [he is] still interested in filing a more complete amended version of this suit.” (Id. at 13.)! Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that--for failure to pay his IPFF--Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See DUCivR 41-2. This action is CLOSED. DATED this Ist day of February, 2021. BY THE COURT:

TENA CAMPBELL United States District Judge

' As he contemplates filing these claims in a new suit in the future, Plaintiff should keep in mind that “Utah's four- year residual statute of limitations .. . governs suits brought under section 1983.” Fratus v. Deland, 49 F.3d 673, 675 (10th Cir. 1995). Plaintiff's claims accrued when "facts that would support a cause of action [we]re or should [have] be[en] apparent." /d. at 675 (citation omitted).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Courtney v. Arbon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-v-arbon-utd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack