Courtney v. Acosta

CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedJune 27, 2022
Docket66, 2022
StatusPublished

This text of Courtney v. Acosta (Courtney v. Acosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Courtney v. Acosta, (Del. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DAVID COURTNEY,1 § § Petitioner Below, § No. 66, 2022 Appellant, § § Court Below: Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § CHRISTINE ACOSTA, § File No. CN15-01320 § Petition No. 21-15330 Respondent Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: June 14, 2022 Decided: June 27, 2022

ORDER

(1) On April 20, 2022, the Senior Court Clerk sent a letter directing the

appellant to pay the Family Court filing fee and transcript cost on or before May 5,

2022, or this Court would issue a notice to show cause why the appeal should not be

dismissed. On May 6, 2022, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice, sent by certified

mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed

for the appellant’s failure to pay the Family Court filing fee and transcript cost. On

May 26, 2022, the Senior Court Clerk issued a second notice, sent by certified mail,

directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for

the appellant’s failure to pay the Family Court filing fee and transcript cost.

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). (2) On June 3, 2022, the Court received the certified mail receipt indicating

that the notice to show cause had been delivered on June 1, 2022. A timely response

to the notice to show cause was due on or before June 13, 2022. The appellant

having failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day

period, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Courtney v. Acosta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-v-acosta-del-2022.