Courtney v. 18th & 8th LLC

78 N.E.3d 1191, 29 N.Y.3d 1045, 56 N.Y.S.3d 506, 2017 NY Slip Op 78287, 2017 WL 2743303, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 1710
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 27, 2017
StatusPublished

This text of 78 N.E.3d 1191 (Courtney v. 18th & 8th LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Courtney v. 18th & 8th LLC, 78 N.E.3d 1191, 29 N.Y.3d 1045, 56 N.Y.S.3d 506, 2017 NY Slip Op 78287, 2017 WL 2743303, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 1710 (N.Y. 2017).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]; Eaton v State of New York, 76 NY2d 824 [1990]).

Judge Feinman taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eaton v. State
559 N.E.2d 675 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 N.E.3d 1191, 29 N.Y.3d 1045, 56 N.Y.S.3d 506, 2017 NY Slip Op 78287, 2017 WL 2743303, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 1710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-v-18th-8th-llc-ny-2017.