Courtney Richmond v. Nolan Wiese

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 4, 2024·No. 24-2065·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 24-2065 ___________________________

Courtney Richmond

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Nolan Wiese; Backyard Specialty Foods; Minnehaha Court Clerks Office, Civil

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Southern ____________

Submitted: October 30, 2024 Filed: November 4, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________

Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Courtney Richmond appeals the district court’s1 dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his pro se complaint. Upon careful review, we conclude that the

1 The Honorable Roberto Lange, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. district court did not err in dismissing the case. See Laclede Gas Co. v. St. Charles Cty., Mo., 713 F.3d 413, 417 (8th Cir. 2013) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction). Accordingly, we grant Richmond’s pending motion to file an amended brief, and we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Courtney Richmond v. Nolan Wiese, (8th Cir. 2024).

Courtney Richmond v. Nolan Wiese (Courtney Richmond v. Nolan Wiese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Laclede Gas Company v. St. Charles County
713 F.3d 413 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)