Courtney Richmond v. Nolan Wiese
This text of Courtney Richmond v. Nolan Wiese (Courtney Richmond v. Nolan Wiese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 24-2065 ___________________________
Courtney Richmond
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nolan Wiese; Backyard Specialty Foods; Minnehaha Court Clerks Office, Civil
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Southern ____________
Submitted: October 30, 2024 Filed: November 4, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________
Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Courtney Richmond appeals the district court’s1 dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his pro se complaint. Upon careful review, we conclude that the
1 The Honorable Roberto Lange, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. district court did not err in dismissing the case. See Laclede Gas Co. v. St. Charles Cty., Mo., 713 F.3d 413, 417 (8th Cir. 2013) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction). Accordingly, we grant Richmond’s pending motion to file an amended brief, and we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Courtney Richmond v. Nolan Wiese, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-richmond-v-nolan-wiese-ca8-2024.