Courtney Reddix v. Cynthia Nguyen

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 22, 2024
DocketA25A0648
StatusPublished

This text of Courtney Reddix v. Cynthia Nguyen (Courtney Reddix v. Cynthia Nguyen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Courtney Reddix v. Cynthia Nguyen, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ November 22, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0648. COURTNEY REDDIX v. CYNTHIA NGUYEN.

Defendant Courtney Reddix filed this direct appeal from a superior court order establishing his paternity to a minor child and requiring him to pay child support. We lack jurisdiction. “Appeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other domestic relations cases” must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b). Because this case involves paternity and the collection of child support, it is a domestic relations case within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). See Booker v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 317 Ga. App. 426, 427 (731 SE2d 110) (2012) (an action in which the “underlying subject matter is a father’s obligation to provide child support” is “a domestic relations case subject to review only by application”); Brown v. Dept. of Human Resources, 204 Ga. App. 27, 27 (418 SE2d 404) (1992) (“Appeals arising out of paternity petitions are domestic relations cases which require compliance with the discretionary appeal procedure of OCGA § 5-6-35.”). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Accordingly, Reddix was required to comply with the discretionary appeal procedure to obtain review of the superior court’s order. His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Booker, 317 Ga. App. at 427; Brown, 204 Ga. App. at 27-28.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 11/22/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Department of Human Resources
418 S.E.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Booker v. Georgia Department of Human Resources
731 S.E.2d 110 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Courtney Reddix v. Cynthia Nguyen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-reddix-v-cynthia-nguyen-gactapp-2024.