Courtney Krenek Garcia v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 28, 2005
Docket13-05-00356-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Courtney Krenek Garcia v. State (Courtney Krenek Garcia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Courtney Krenek Garcia v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

         NUMBERS 13-05-354-CR,

                     13-05-355-CR, AND 13-05-356-CR

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________

COURTNEY KRENEK GARCIA,                                    Appellant,

                                           v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                              Appellee.

_________________________________________________________

              On appeal from County Court at Law No. One

                           of Victoria County, Texas.

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Castillo

                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, COURTNEY KRENEK GARCIA, attempted to perfect appeals from  judgments entered by County Court at Law No. One of Victoria County, Texas.  Sentence in these causes was imposed on April 11, 2005.   The notices of appeal were due to be filed on May 11, 2005, but were not filed until May 27, 2005.   Said notices of appeal are untimely filed.

Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing the notice of appeal if such notice is filed within  fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension.  Appellant failed to file her notices of appeal and a motion requesting an extension of time within such period.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect her appeals, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  The appeals are hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 28th day of July, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Courtney Krenek Garcia v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-krenek-garcia-v-state-texapp-2005.