Courtney Douglass v. Convergent Outsourcing

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Courtney Douglass v. Convergent Outsourcing. Read the opinion of the Court — 765 F.3d 299
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 10, 2014·No. 13-3588·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT September 30, 2014

No. 13-3588

COURTNEY DOUGLASS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Appellant

v.

CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING,

formerly known as ER SOLUTIONS, INC.

(E.D. Pa. No. 2-12-cv-01524)

Present: FISHER and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges and MARIANI, District Judge

Motion by Appellant to Amend Opinion to Reflect Counsel of Record SaraEllen Hutchison as Co-Counsel for Appellant.

Respectfully, Clerk/pdb for tmm

_________________________________ORDER________________________________ The foregoing motion is granted and the opinion will be amended to reflect SaraEllen Hutchison as co-counsel of record for Appellant. This amendment to the opinion does not alter the judgment of this Court. An amended opinion will be issued forthwith.

By the Court,

s/Anthony J. Scirica Circuit Judge

Dated: October 10, 2014

 Honorable Robert D. Mariani, District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

tmm/cc: all counsel of record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Courtney Douglass v. Convergent Outsourcing, (3d Cir. 2014).

Courtney Douglass v. Convergent Outsourcing (Courtney Douglass v. Convergent Outsourcing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.