Courtney Costello v. City of Los Angeles

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedJanuary 17, 2023
Docket2:22-cv-07520
StatusUnknown

This text of Courtney Costello v. City of Los Angeles (Courtney Costello v. City of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Courtney Costello v. City of Los Angeles, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-07520-AB-JEM Document Filed 01/17/23 Pagelof2 Page ID#:45

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: CV 22-07520-AB (JEMx) Date: January 17, 2023

Title: Courtney Costello et al v. City of Los Angeles et al

Present: The Honorable ANDRE BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge Carla Badirian N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Appearing None Appearing

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before January 31, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on the Defendant(s).

CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk CB

Case 2:22-cv-07520-AB-JEM Document 11 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:46

Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk CB 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Link v. Wabash Railroad
370 U.S. 626 (Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Courtney Costello v. City of Los Angeles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-costello-v-city-of-los-angeles-cacd-2023.