Courtney Chadwick v. Natalie Jones

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 5, 2015
Docket05-14-00137-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Courtney Chadwick v. Natalie Jones (Courtney Chadwick v. Natalie Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Courtney Chadwick v. Natalie Jones, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 3, 2015.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00137-CV

COURTNEY CHADWICK, Appellant V. NATALIE JONES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF11-09107-Z

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Brown Opinion by Justice Brown Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated August 26, 2014, we notified

appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both her brief

and an extension motion within ten days. Thereafter, we granted appellant’s motion to extend

time to file her brief and ordered appellant’s brief to be filed by September 21, 2014. We

expressly cautioned appellant that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal

without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed her brief, requested an additional

extension of time to file her brief, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status

of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c).

/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE

140137F.P05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

COURTNEY CHADWICK, Appellant On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-14-00137-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DF11-09107-Z. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. Justices NATALIE JONES, Appellee Bridges and Fillmore participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee NATALIE JONES recover her costs of this appeal from appellant COURTNEY CHADWICK.

Judgment entered this 3rd day of February, 2015.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Courtney Chadwick v. Natalie Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-chadwick-v-natalie-jones-texapp-2015.