Courtney Bros. v. John Deere Plow Co.

84 So. 690, 122 Miss. 611
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1920·No. No. 21064·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

On a. former day of this term the decree of the court below was reversed, and a modified decree was directed to be entered here, 84 So. 185, which was accordingly done, but there was included therein as damages five per cent, of the amount of the decree rendered in the court below.

The appellant’s motion to correct this decree by striking the five per cent, damages therefrom must be sustained, for the reason that such damages can be allowed only in accordance with section 4926, Code of 1906 (Hemingway’s Code, section 3202), which provides therefor only in case the judgment or decree of the court below be affirmed, or the appellant fail to prosecute his appeal to effect.

Motion sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Courtney Bros. v. John Deere Plow Co., 84 So. 690, 122 Miss. 611 (Mich. 1920).

84 So. 690 (Courtney Bros. v. John Deere Plow Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ford v. Commercial Securities Co.
70 So. 2d 525 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
Shipman v. Lovelace
60 So. 2d 559 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Thomas
144 So. 50 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1932)