Courter v. Peer
134 A. 844, 4 N.J. Misc. 865, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 93
This text of 134 A. 844 (Courter v. Peer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Courter v. Peer, 134 A. 844, 4 N.J. Misc. 865, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 93 (N.J. 1926).
Opinion
This matter is before us in all respects and with the same reasons urged as in Alois Rou, Prosecutor, v. Thomas Peer et al., No. 280 of this term, and our conclusion is that the writ of certiorari must be dismissed for the same reasons given in case No. 280.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Ingram
169 A.2d 860 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 A. 844, 4 N.J. Misc. 865, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courter-v-peer-nj-1926.