Coursin v. Shrader

Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas

Coursin v. Shrader

23 A. 801, 146 Pa. 475, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1251

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County·Decided January 4, 1892·No. No. 198·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam :

The appellant has assigned a single extract from the charge of the court below, as error. An examination of the charge as a whole shows that the learned judge fairly submitted to the jury the question of the payment of the mortgage. If paid, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. The jury having found, under proper instructions, that the mortgage had not been, paid, the verdict for plaintiff naturally followed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam :

The appellant has assigned a single extract from the charge of the court below, as error. An examination of the charge as a whole shows that the learned judge fairly submitted to the jury the question of the payment of the mortgage. If paid, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. The jury having found, under proper instructions, that the mortgage had not been, paid, the verdict for plaintiff naturally followed.

Judgment affirmed.

Coursin v. Shrader, 23 A. 801, 146 Pa. 475, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1251 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

23 A. 801 (Coursin v. Shrader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related