Courley v. Shoemakers
1 Cole. Cas. 103
This text of 1 Cole. Cas. 103 (Courley v. Shoemakers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Courley v. Shoemakers, 1 Cole. Cas. 103 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
as fufficient caufe for granting fuch motion, mere~ ly that
material witneffes refide in the County to which the party withes to remove the caufe; but it mull be added that evidence will there he given of fome material faa which aEtually happened there~ Crygiers vs. Long. TN this cafe a verdia was entered for the plain tifF fats which aEtually happened there~
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. Cas. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courley-v-shoemakers-nysupct-1800.