Courier v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.

177 A.D.2d 1020, 579 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15798

This text of 177 A.D.2d 1020 (Courier v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Courier v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A., 177 A.D.2d 1020, 579 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motions of both parties for summary judgment. Material issues of fact exist whether plaintiff and her husband signed the second promissory note, which was substituted for the first note, in reliance upon material misrepresentations made by defendant. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, A. P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 A.D.2d 1020, 579 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courier-v-marine-midland-bank-n-a-nyappdiv-1991.