Courey International (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Fleming

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Courey International (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Fleming

663 So. 2d 5, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11666, 1995 WL 654470

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 8, 1995

DocketNo. 95-1233

StatusPublished

This text of 663 So. 2d 5 (Courey International (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Fleming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Courey International (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Fleming, 663 So. 2d 5, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11666, 1995 WL 654470 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a close examination of the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and that it properly denied the plaintiff’s motion for temporary and permanent injunction. Wise v. Schmidek, 649 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); American Agronomics Corp. v. Ross, 309 So.2d 582 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 321 So.2d 558 (Fla.1975); Tasty Box Lunch Co. v. Kennedy, 121 So.2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After a close examination of the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and that it properly denied the plaintiff’s motion for temporary and permanent injunction. Wise v. Schmidek, 649 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); American Agronomics Corp. v. Ross, 309 So.2d 582 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 321 So.2d 558 (Fla.1975); Tasty Box Lunch Co. v. Kennedy, 121 So.2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

663 So. 2d 5, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11666, 1995 WL 654470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courey-international-usa-inc-v-fleming-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack