Courey International (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Fleming
663 So. 2d 5, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11666, 1995 WL 654470
Opinion
After a close examination of the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and that it properly denied the plaintiff’s motion for temporary and permanent injunction. Wise v. Schmidek, 649 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); American Agronomics Corp. v. Ross, 309 So.2d 582 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 321 So.2d 558 (Fla.1975); Tasty Box Lunch Co. v. Kennedy, 121 So.2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Courey International (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Fleming, 663 So. 2d 5, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11666, 1995 WL 654470 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
663 So. 2d 5 (Courey International (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tasty Box Lunch Co. v. Kennedy
121 So. 2d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Wise v. Schmidek
649 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
American Agronomics Corp. v. Ross
309 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)