Couples v. Couples

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Couples v. Couples

623 So. 2d 585, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8751, 1993 WL 321726

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 25, 1993

DocketNos. 93-0894, 93-0895

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 623 So. 2d 585 (Couples v. Couples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Couples v. Couples, 623 So. 2d 585, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8751, 1993 WL 321726 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in part and reverse in part. We reverse that part of the trial court’s order awarding the appellee “an additional $25,000 a month” beyond the other amounts allowed for temporary support, for the wife to spend “however she desires.” Cf. Wenzel v. Wenzel, 512 So.2d 275 (Fla. 4th DCA1987). We affirm the balance of the temporary support order.

We also affirm the order for temporary attorney’s fees, suit money and costs. Our affirmance of these awards, however, is without prejudice to the appellant to subsequently challenge any claims for fees and costs alleged to have been actually incurred. The appellee retains the burden on this issue, regardless of the trial court’s tentative allowance of fees, suit money and costs based on estimated future expenditures.

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in part and reverse in part. We reverse that part of the trial court’s order awarding the appellee “an additional $25,000 a month” beyond the other amounts allowed for temporary support, for the wife to spend “however she desires.” Cf. Wenzel v. Wenzel, 512 So.2d 275 (Fla. 4th DCA1987). We affirm the balance of the temporary support order.

We also affirm the order for temporary attorney’s fees, suit money and costs. Our affirmance of these awards, however, is without prejudice to the appellant to subsequently challenge any claims for fees and costs alleged to have been actually incurred. The appellee retains the burden on this issue, regardless of the trial court’s tentative allowance of fees, suit money and costs based on estimated future expenditures.

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

623 So. 2d 585, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8751, 1993 WL 321726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/couples-v-couples-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack