County Utilities, Inc. v. Eastern Garden Center, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

County Utilities, Inc. v. Eastern Garden Center, Inc.

12 A.D.2d 952, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12745

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 952 (County Utilities, Inc. v. Eastern Garden Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

County Utilities, Inc. v. Eastern Garden Center, Inc., 12 A.D.2d 952, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover on a series of promissory notes made and delivered by the corporate defendant and indorsed by the individual defendant Hauck, the latter appeals from the part of the order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 27, 1960, made on reargument, which adheres to the original order of August 23, 1960, insofar as it granted summary judgment against him, and which makes the same determination. With respect to the corporate defendant, the motion for summary judgment was denied because it had filed a petition in bankruptcy; and no appeal was taken from such denial. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover on a series of promissory notes made and delivered by the corporate defendant and indorsed by the individual defendant Hauck, the latter appeals from the part of the order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 27, 1960, made on reargument, which adheres to the original order of August 23, 1960, insofar as it granted summary judgment against him, and which makes the same determination. With respect to the corporate defendant, the motion for summary judgment was denied because it had filed a petition in bankruptcy; and no appeal was taken from such denial. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 952, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-utilities-inc-v-eastern-garden-center-inc-nyappdiv-1961.