County of Whiteside v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

County of Whiteside v. State

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 523, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 95

Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided May 14, 1931·No. No. 1529·Published

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Clabity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for relief under the Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Acts of 1919 and 1925 for loss sustained through the destruction of certain tubercular cattle owned by the County of Whiteside as a part of a dairy herd of the White-side County Home. The total claim is made in the sum of $280.93.

There appears to be no contention as to the claim coming within the law, although the State is liable for only one-third and the Attorney General comes and recommends an allowance of $123.87 to claimant, being one-third of the claim and would be the extent of the liability of the State of Illinois.

Therefore, this court recommends that claimant be allowed $123.87.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Clabity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for relief under the Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Acts of 1919 and 1925 for loss sustained through the destruction of certain tubercular cattle owned by the County of Whiteside as a part of a dairy herd of the White-side County Home. The total claim is made in the sum of $280.93.

There appears to be no contention as to the claim coming within the law, although the State is liable for only one-third and the Attorney General comes and recommends an allowance of $123.87 to claimant, being one-third of the claim and would be the extent of the liability of the State of Illinois.

Therefore, this court recommends that claimant be allowed $123.87.

County of Whiteside v. State, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 523, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 95 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1931).

Pincite

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 523 (County of Whiteside v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.