County of Westchester v. Dept. Health, C. N.Y.

74 N.E.2d 190, 297 N.Y. 491, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 997
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 1947·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the courts below the motion for change of venue was properly denied and the motion for an injunction pendente lite was granted in the exercise of discretion. There was no abuse of discretion and, accordingly, the orders appealed from are affirmed, and all questions affecting the validity of regulation 2a of the Board of Health of the City of New York are reserved for consideration and determination upon a trial of the issues. The orders are affirmed, with costs and the question certified is answered in the affirmative.

Loughran, Ch J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ., concur.

Orders affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

County of Westchester v. Dept. Health, C. N.Y., 74 N.E.2d 190, 297 N.Y. 491, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 997 (N.Y. 1947).

74 N.E.2d 190 (County of Westchester v. Dept. Health, C. N.Y.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Public Service Mutual Insurance v. Murtagh
15 Misc. 2d 973 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
WELSH FARMS, INC. v. Bergsma
84 A.2d 631 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Reeve v. O'Dwyer
199 Misc. 123 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)