County of Wake v. Johnson

206 N.C. 478
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 2, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 206 N.C. 478 (County of Wake v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
County of Wake v. Johnson, 206 N.C. 478 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

CONNOR, J.

Tbe title of tbe purcbaser at a foreclosure sale, to whom tbe laud described in tbe complaint bas been conveyed by tbe commissioner appointed by tbe court for that purpose, cannot be challenged by a party to tbe action in wbicb tbe decree of foreclosure was rendered, upon tbe application of tbe purcbaser for a writ of assistance. Tbe decree and all proceedings pursuant thereto are binding and conclusive on tbe parties to tbe action, and on their privies. See Bank v. Leverette, 187 N. C., 743, 123 S. E., 268; Exum v. Baker, 115 N. C., 242, 20 S. E., 448.

In tbe instant case, tbe deed of tbe commissioner to tbe town of Wake Forest is not void. A municipal corporation bas tbe power to purchase land for certain purposes. 0. S., 2623(3). It does not appear from tbe record in this case that tbe purchase of tbe land described in its deed by tbe town of Wake Forest was ultra vires.

Tbe order that tbe clerk of tbe Superior Court issue tbe writ of assistance in accordance with tbe motion of tbe town of Wake Forest is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Exum v. . Baker
20 S.E. 448 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1894)
Don v. Don
123 S.E. 268 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 N.C. 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-wake-v-johnson-nc-1934.