County of Tuolumne v. Railroad Commission of California

267 U.S. 584, 45 S. Ct. 461

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat: 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong, 150 U. S. 85, 88; Erie R. R. Co. v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148, 154; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Woodford, 234 U. S. 46, 51.

Mr. William Grant, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. A. P. Cutten and Mr. Carl I. Wheat, with whom Mr. Hugh Gordon and Mr. Wm. B. Bosley were on the brief, for defendants in error.