County of Tuolumne v. Oakdale Irrigation District

196 F.2d 927, 196 P.2d 927, 32 Cal. 2d 891, 1948 Cal. LEXIS 274

Opinion

CARTER, J.

This case involves the same questions presented in County of Mariposa v. Merced Irrigation District, ante, p. 467 [196 P.2d 920], and is controlled thereby. Therefore the petition for a peremptory writ of mandate is denied, and the alternative writ is discharged.

Gibson, C. J., Shenk, J., Edmonds, J., Traynor, J., Schauer, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

Petitioner’s application for a rehearing was denied September 27,1948.