County of Sierra v. Flanigan

87 P. 913, 149 Cal. 769, 1906 Cal. LEXIS 305
California Supreme Court·Decided October 1, 1906·No. Sac. No. 1305.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

This case was argued and submitted with County of Plumas v.Wheeler, just decided, ante, p. 758, [87 P. 909], and involves the validity of an ordinance of Sierra County, substantially similar to the ordinance of Plumas *Page 770 County, considered in the Wheeler case. Here a general demurrer to the county's complaint setting forth the ordinance and seeking to recover license fees under it, was overruled, with leave to the defendant to answer. Upon his default for failure to answer within the time allowed, plaintiff had judgment according to the prayer of its complaint. Defendant appeals.

For the reasons stated in County of Plumas v. Wheeler, ante, p. 758, the complaint stated a cause of action, and the demurrer was properly overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.

Shaw, J., Angellotti, J., and Beatty, C.J., concurred.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

County of Sierra v. Flanigan, 87 P. 913, 149 Cal. 769, 1906 Cal. LEXIS 305 (Cal. 1906).

87 P. 913 (County of Sierra v. Flanigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Mono v. Depauli
100 P. 717 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)
Wheeler v. County of Plumas
87 P. 802 (California Supreme Court, 1906)