County of Sarasota v. Neville

158 So. 2d 533, 1966 A.M.C. 809
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 4, 1963
DocketNo. 3858
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 So. 2d 533 (County of Sarasota v. Neville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
County of Sarasota v. Neville, 158 So. 2d 533, 1966 A.M.C. 809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant County of Sarasota, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, appeals from an order of the lower court, wherein, on motion of the appellees, the said County was dropped as party plaintiff under Rule 1.18, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A.

The complaint in this case consists of two counts, the first of which alleged facts showing that the appellees had violated certain provisions of Chapter 253, Fla.Stat.1961, F.S.A., by intentionally adding to or extending their land on or into the navigable waters of Little Sarasota Bay, without having applied for or obtaining a permit to do so from the County. Count Two alleged facts showing that the appellees had violated the existing bulkhead line by extending, creating or filling of land or islands outward into the waters of Little Sarasota Bay beyond the estab[534]*534lished bulkhead line. The complaint prayed for injunctive relief to restrain the defendants from further adding to or extending their lands or constructing any islands without first obtaining a permit, as required by law. . The appellees moved to drop Sarasota County as a party on the ground that the Sarasota County Water and Navigation Control Authority was the only proper party plaintiff.

Sec. 253.127, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., provides:

“The trustees of the internal improvement trust fund, the board of county commissioners or governing body of any municipality, or any aggrieved person, shall have the power to enforce the provisions of this law by appropriate suit in equity.”

The above section of the statutes immediately precedes Sec. 253.128, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., which states:

“In any county where the legislature by special law or general law with local application has heretofore or hereafter transferred or delegated to any county board or agency other than the board of county commissioners or the governing body of any municipality powers and duties over the establishment of bulkhead line or lines, dredging permits, fill permits, sea wall construction or any other powers of a like nature such agency shall have jurisdiction under this law in lieu of the board of county commissioners or the governing body of any municipality as the case may be.”

These two sections above quoted, when read in connection with the provisions of the Sarasota County Water and Navigation Control Authority Act,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neville v. County of Sarasota
158 So. 2d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 So. 2d 533, 1966 A.M.C. 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-sarasota-v-neville-fladistctapp-1963.