County of San Joaquin v. Superior Court

33 P. 482, 98 Cal. 602, 1893 Cal. LEXIS 962
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJune 12, 1893
Docket15227
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 33 P. 482 (County of San Joaquin v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
County of San Joaquin v. Superior Court, 33 P. 482, 98 Cal. 602, 1893 Cal. LEXIS 962 (Cal. 1893).

Opinion

The Court

This is an original proceeding by mandamus to compel the superior court of Sau Joaquin County to change the place of trial of an action of ejectment to which the judge of said court are parties defendant.

A motion to change the place of trial was made and promptly overruled. The proper remedy of the petitioner was an appeal from that order. In such cases mandamus is only proper when the court refuses or unreasonably delays to decide the motion, as in Krumdick v. White, 32 Pac. Rep. 800, and Livermore v. Brundage, 64 Cal. 299. But when the motion is overruled without delay, an appeal from the order affords a complete remedy, aud if the case is for any reason one of urgency the hearing of the appeal can be expedited so as to reach a decision as soon as it can be reached in an original proceeding.

Proceeding dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington ex rel. Ellis v. General Fruit Corp.
4 F. Supp. 541 (W.D. Washington, 1933)
Scott v. Superior Court
256 P. 603 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
Winfrey v. Benton
1910 OK 39 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 P. 482, 98 Cal. 602, 1893 Cal. LEXIS 962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-san-joaquin-v-superior-court-cal-1893.