County of Onondaga v. Kinsella

187 A.D.2d 1014
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 18, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 187 A.D.2d 1014 (County of Onondaga v. Kinsella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
County of Onondaga v. Kinsella, 187 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs, counterclaim for enforcement granted and petition dismissed. Memorandum: There is substantial evidence in the record to support respondents’ determination that petitioner engaged in an improper employer practice (see, Civil Service Law § 209-a [1] [d]) when it unilaterally transferred the responsibility for guarding certain prisoners from employees of the Sheriffs Department, represented by the Deputy Sheriffs Benevolent Association, to employees of the Correction Department, represented by the Civil Service Employees Association (see, Matter of Levitt v Board of Collective Bargaining, 79 NY2d 120; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 182). (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Balio, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Town of Greece v. Cuevas
280 A.D.2d 967 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 A.D.2d 1014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-onondaga-v-kinsella-nyappdiv-1992.