COUNTY OF ONEIDA v. SHAH, M.D., M.P.H., NIRAV R.

128 A.D.3d 1381, 6 N.Y.S.3d 510
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 1, 2015
DocketCA 14-01405
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 128 A.D.3d 1381 (COUNTY OF ONEIDA v. SHAH, M.D., M.P.H., NIRAV R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
COUNTY OF ONEIDA v. SHAH, M.D., M.P.H., NIRAV R., 128 A.D.3d 1381, 6 N.Y.S.3d 510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered March 14, 2014 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action. The judgment, among other things, directed respondents-de *1382 fendants to pay petitioner-plaintiffs pending claims for reimbursement in the amount of $3,123,878.56.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the petition-complaint in its entirety and granting judgment in favor of respondents-defendants as follows:

It is adjudged and declared that section 61 of part D of section 1 of chapter 56 of the Laws of 2012 has not been shown to be unconstitutional, and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs (see Matter of County of Chautauqua v Shah, 126 AD3d 1317 [2015]). Present — Smith, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Sconiers and DeJoseph, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 A.D.3d 1381, 6 N.Y.S.3d 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-oneida-v-shah-md-mph-nirav-r-nyappdiv-2015.