County of Oneida v. Blake

262 A.D. 941, 29 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6544
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 2, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 A.D. 941 (County of Oneida v. Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
County of Oneida v. Blake, 262 A.D. 941, 29 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6544 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and facts, without costs, and the matter remitted to the commissioners of appraisal for a rehearing in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: This is an appeal from an order confirming the report of the commissioners of appraisal in a condemnation proceeding. The commissioners report that they find the fair market value of the entire property before the appropriation to be $13,700; and the fair market value of the remainder after the appropriation to be $11,470. The difference is $2,230. They find the fair market value of the land actually appropriated to be $1,250. They award damages for $2,230 plus $1,250, a total of $3,480. Our understanding of the language of the report is that all items of consequential damage have been considered in arriving at the fair market value of the part remaining after the taking. If there is any such item not so included the report should so state, specifying such item or items and the amount of damage awarded on account of each. The difference in market value before and after includes the fair market value of the part appropriated. An award which includes the value of the part appropriated plus the difference in market value before and after the appropriation results in the giving of double damages. The order is reversed and the matter remitted to the commissioners of appraisal for further consideration and report in accordance with this memorandum. All concur. (The order confirms the report of the commissioners of condemnation, denies the application of the county to have the report referred back for correction and awards defendants certain sums in a condemnation proceeding.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Incorporated Village of Hewlett Bay Park
56 Misc. 2d 1085 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 941, 29 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-oneida-v-blake-nyappdiv-1941.